2008/8/10 David Juran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello. > > I noticed that ffmpeg in the F-8 and F-9 version of rpmfusion is the > version from livna devel with the new include-files structure. Is this > intentional? I would much rather prefer if the livna F-8 version was > used for rpmfusion F-8 so that I wouldn't have to maintain two different > versions of transcode for livna and rpmfusion.
What is the status of transcode with the ffmpeg version in livna development ? The plan is to choose only one version of ffmpeg and we cannot choose an older snapshot for many reasons. - Clean upgrade path from freshrpms - The header move from ffmpeg need to concentrate on fixing headers project to the new scheme (and not fix to the older which is a regression). - The ffmpeg team has drop support for older snapshot (with older scheme for headers). Now If you have problem with swscaler enabled ffmpeg, ffmpeg-compat is here for that.( with the old header scheme). The plan was to drop ffmpeg-compat for F-10, but we may build ffmpeg-compat in rpmfusion for F-10 for now and then, have the proper obsoletes/provides done from ffmpeg side to obsoltes ffmpeg-compat Nicolas (kwizart) > > /David >