http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40
Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-13 19:59:34 --- no real review; just a few things I noticed when I checked that the repo files are correct - the release rpm IMHO needs to be split -- one for free, one for nonfree (the latter needs to require the free one of course), as there are people that only want free. I'd assume that those simply don't want to get the nonfree repo files at all. - free and nonfree use different keys for signing -- that way users can check if a package came from the free or nonfree repo. - "BuildArch: noarch" is there two times - the provides and obsoletes should be added once we have everything (including kmods) in -- for the start just leave them out; and what about dribble? - Why include the GPL as text when you have "License: BSD" in the spec file? (And BSD or WTF is likely the way better license anyway) - I don't much like to use the term "devel" for the development branch, as some people will assume "files needed for developing" and not "RPM Fusion's development branch"; I'd go for "development" there or (preferred by me) just use the term rawhide (e.g. rpmfusion-{non,}free-rawhide) just like Fedora - "failovermethod=priority" This is the default in yum these days iirc. - mirrorlist=http://mirrors.rpmfusion.org/mirrorlist?repo=rpmfusion-free-devel&arch=$basearch" We don't have a Fedora mirror manager yet and I doubt that anyone want to set one up over the next few weeks. So for now it's likely way easier to set up a static mirrorlist file somewhere. For that "failovermethod=roundrobin" might be more wise if we want to spread the load. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.