On 18.08.2008 12:51, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2008 at 11:57, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2008 at 06:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 18.08.2008 00:17, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Sunday, 17 August 2008 at 22:34, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 11 August 2008 at 18:31, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 10.08.2008 14:42, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
[...]
There is a live in livna -- we could just import it and those three and
packages depending on them should be able to build.
Kwizard told me that I should not import live because he has a imporved
package; see http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1951
It's more a rename than a new package:
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/9/SPECS/live555.spec
But I didn't want to do that, as
- it's unreviewed
- I don't know if that change is fine for Rathann
So how to proceed? Anybody willing to review it?
I've reviewed the changes and they are mostly OK. However, they
needed a few adjustments to follow Fedora Packaging Guidelines
and to ensure smooth upgrades. I will import the updated package
into rpmfusion/free/devel as soon as I get my access sorted out.
OK, I think I set up everything correctly, so live555 is imported
and tagged, but I can't submit new builds:
$ make build
PLAGUE_CLIENT_CONFIG=/home/staff/rathann/.plague-client-rpmfusion.cfg
/usr/bin/plague-client build live555 live555-0-0_20_2008_07_25_fc10
f10-free
Server returned an error: Insufficient privileges.
Fixed -- users in plague still need to be added manually. But why did
you add a binary file to CVS:
$ ls live555/devel/*.gz
live555/devel/liblivemedia_2007.02.20-2.diff.gz
That afaik won't work. The file needs to be in look-aside-cache just
like the sources.
It's a patch.
It's a compressed patch and CVS afaics doesn't handle binaries very well
(svn iirc does, do in livna it would have been acceptable).
Build job #638 completed, but only on ppc(64).
Feel free to import and queue the package for F8 and F9 then. Or shall I
handle that?
x86 seems offline.
Yes, just as mentioned in
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-August/000829.html
earlier today ;-)
CU
knurd
