http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34
Xavier Bachelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-20 00:41:25 --- + source files match upstream :9ee2d6c8bb192e214b2674042260cf36 + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license + license is open source-compatible. License text is included. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock. + package installs properly + rpmlint is silent. = final provides and requires are sane: Some duplicates requires with different versions specified. Harmless, perl(WWW::Mechanize) perl(WWW::Mechanize) >= 1.02 perl(XML::Twig) perl(XML::Twig) >= 3.10 perl(XML::Twig) >= 3.28 + %check is present and all tests pass + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. = No desktop file, but it's not really useful in this case. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.