Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 18.11.2008 11:12, Hans de Goede wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 18.11.2008 09:28, Hans de Goede wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
2) we still need to make this work seamlessly for end users, so if
we do this I vote for putting a .repo file pointing to livna in
rpmfusion-nonfree-release
I strongly vote against that. If I as user install a package
foo-release then I expect it to only install repo files for the repo
"foo" and not for random other 3rd party repos I might never have
heard of or which I might not want. And something like that could
backfire on us/taint us easily as well.
Well, it is not a random third party repo now is it,
For current users: no. But I bet in a year or two new Fedora users will
get confused and start to answer question.
it is one of the repos which make up the new rpmfusion, also we want
this to work seamlessly.
Enabling a repository that ships libdvdcss automatically is nearly just
as bad as shipping it directly in our repos (¹). It hence would
pollute/taint RPM Fusion and imho is a completely no go.
Erm, shipping a file containing a link is something very different from
shipping, and if we ship a third party repo enablement tool we will be in
effect doing the same.
Also this seems to be an ever sliding issue, first we would ship it despite the
concerns of a few, then you changed your mind and I and others reluctantly
agreed, but we also agreed we would come up with some seamless integration
solution. And now we are also slipping from the seamless integration solution
to some horrible convoluted hack. I'm very unhappy about this. Esp. about how
you seem to keep coming back upon made decisions.
(¹) the reasons are similar to the reasons why Fedora doesn't even link
to RPM Fusion
And Fedora Legal actually has cleared doing that (linking to rpmfusion from the
wiki), this is something which still has to be implemented, but the permission
is there. This was one of the main reasons to do the free / non-free split, to
give Fedora something it can link to without even giving the appearance of
promoting non free software.
Regards,
Hans
