Hi! I thought we have sorted that out. Do we really have to go through this discussion again?
> Just ignore that issue. We should satisfy the majority's needs, and > the majority of Fedora users (obviously) needs DVD playback (as well > as other patents/crypto stuff). If that guy(s) stops contributing - > that's not a problem at all. We easily find someone who will > contribute instead. It's not just about contributors. It's also about bloggers, wikis and press. In a lot of countries it would not be allowed to link to RPMfusion (or probably even mention its name) if RPMfusion offers software to circumvent copy protection. I will not repeat here what I said my last posting. Please feel free to find it in the archive and read it. The bottom line is: RPMfusion will not just lose some contributors, but will lose a lot of free advertisement and public attention. Is this price really worth to keep one single RPM package with no dependencies, that can be easily installed with a one-liner from somewhere else? For me it means that if RPMfusion is offering software that is illegal in Germany, I will stop blogging about it in fedorablog.de and remove the package lists from repowatch.fedorablog.de. You can blame me for being a sissy, but I see no other option for me. I am tired about this discussion. It cannot be that first we find something that seemed like a consensus against libdvdcss, and then suddenly voices appear again pro libdvdcss, and the discussion starts all over again. To the people who are responsible for RPMfusion: Please make up your mind, and then make an official and irrevocable (!) commitment pro or contra libdvdcss. Even a commitment pro libdvdcss would be better than this state of insecurity we currently have, IMHO. Regards -- Richard "Shred" Körber