http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391
--- Comment #13 from NicolasChauvet <[email protected]> 2009-06-03 13:15:13 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Yes. vlcwidget.py can be used as a standalone script. i.e. > vlcwidget.py video_file.avi > If I don't make it executable, rpmlint complains with something like > "non-executable script" As the vlcwidget.py in sources is set executable, I would consider this as a bug in distutils for not having preserved the permission. Having it chmoded is the right thing then. > In the previous version of my SRPM, I used to put vlcwidget.py into > %{_bindir}. > But now setup.py is installing the file in %{python_sitearch}, so I removed my > manual installation to %{_bindir}. That was decided by the upstream maintainer, I've made it notice that change. But it is more intended to be imported from python. I don't like at all this dirty hack : echo "include COPYING" >> MANIFEST.in Packager including a license is totally wrong, you don't have right to do that. If you want a source archive to bundle a license, you can send a patch upstream asking to do that. But you are not allowed to do that yourself. What is mandatory according to the license Guideline is to have a "License:" Field from within the spec file, not for the package to bundle a license, specially if it's clear enough. The only case when a license is mandatory is when a firmware (or other component) needs to allow redistribution , because that needs to be explicitly written. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
