http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310
--- Comment #19 from Mikhail Kalenkov <mikhail.kalen...@gmail.com> 2009-06-17 13:19:42 --- (In reply to comment #17) Sorry, I forgot to reply to your question. > ? Why are > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/books > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/bases > owned by the main package but not by their respective subpackages? (In > contrast, the > %{_datadir}/%{name}/sounds/ > directory is owned by the subpackage.) I did it intentionally. I thought that third party packages may keep their files in books and bases directories. The same applies for %{_datadir}/%{name}/photos directory. This directory is empty, because chess player photos are not distributed with scid tarball, but I built several packages with historic and contemporary players which keep their files in %{_datadir}/%{name}/photos directory. sounds directory couldn't extended in the same manner because scid hasn't such functionality. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.