On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 14:31 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2009/8/16 Jonathan Dieter <[email protected]>: > > On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 11:25 +0200, [email protected] > > wrote: > >> catalyst-kmod-9.5-1.fc10.8 > > > > What's the story with getting Catalyst 9.7 into F10? Even for > > updates-testing? Are there still problems getting Catalyst running on > > the 2.6.29 and 2.6.30 kernels (which is keeping Catalyst out of F11 and > > Rawhide). Would the maintainer like any help? > There is no clean support for 2.6.29 yet in catalyst. > So I wonder what kind of help you want to offer !?
I figured something along the lines of rewriting the driver from scratch to use the new quantum-pipelining infrastructure to increase the card's speed by a factor of 10 while halving its power usage, and I was planning on writing it using Fortran (with some COBOL where necessary). </delusions_of_grandeur> No, what I really meant was help in getting 9.7 into F10, I definitely don't have the kernel-foo to fix catalyst for the newer kernels. > Now that's true that 9.7 could be updated in F-10 for 2.6.27. > But aren't we waiting for 9.8 ? > > Anyway, If you want to give a hand for catalyst in rpmfusion the > better would be to submit an update bugreport having the spec already > updated for lastest version... Ok, sounds good. Let me see what I can do. > Now keeping 9.5 can also be justified, that will be up to firewing1 to say... Thanks, Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
