http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803
--- Comment #10 from Jochen Schmitt <[email protected]> 2009-11-03 19:19:21 --- Good: + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Package contains most recent stabel release of the application + License tag states IBM as a valid OSS License + Package has proper BuildRoot definition + Could downloading package via spectool -g + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 8375721949e33a91aa62e006f2ba7b3e) + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is quite for source rpm + Rpmlint is quite for binary packages + Rpmlint is quite for debuginfo packages + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning fo %clean and %install + Mock build works fine + All files are owned by the package + Package files has proper file permissions + Package has proper ChangeLog Bad: - Please take a more verbose summary text for the package - IBM Public license is not compatible the the license used for the Linux kernel. So we need a clarification to which repository we should put your package. - Package doesn't contains verbatin copy of the license -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
