http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #17 from [email protected] 2010-01-13 08:13:20 --- More comments: * Package contains a patch backup: /usr/lib64/xbmc/system/python/spyce/spyce.py.spyce Proposal: Don't use patch backups (I personally consider them to be harmful). * This file is bogus: /usr/lib64/xbmc/visualisations/xbmc_vis.h Proposal: Add rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/xbmc/visualisations/xbmc_vis.h to %install (I thought this already had been in Rolf's original *.spec ?) * Building goom triggers this warning: ... /builddir/build/BUILD/xbmc-9.11/xbmc/visualizations/Goom/goom2k4-0/missing: Unknown `--run' option Try `/builddir/build/BUILD/xbmc-9.11/xbmc/visualizations/Goom/goom2k4-0/missing --help' for more information configure: WARNING: `missing' script is too old or missing ... The solution to this issue would be to either upgrade/patch xbmc/visualizations/Goom/goom2k4-0/missing to a newer version of "missing" or to extend "bootstrap" to be run inside of xbmc/visualizations/Goom/goom2k4-0 (Dangerous!) * RPM_OPT_FLAGS are still not acknowledged correctly in all places. * xbmc's webserver frequently dumps core on x86_64. No actual surprise, because it's based on GoAhead, a piece of SW which is known not to be 64bit compliant. I am currently testing a hack to GoAhead with my local rpm and keep you posted. * xbmc still applies local files from its local copies of zlib. [I am working on it - Patch to come soon.] * I am not convinced about Rolf's "win patch". Instead, I am using this in %prep: ... # The tarball contains prebuilt binaries find \( -name '*.so' -o -name '*.DLL' -o -name '*.dll' -o -name '*.lib' -o -name '*.zlib' -o -name '*.obj' -o -name '*.exe' -o -name '*.vis' \) | xargs rm -f # Force using the system-wide versions rm -rf lib ... * Has anybody tested "xbmc-standalone" rsp. the xbmc.desktop? My attempts were without much success. AFAICT, xbmc-standalone doesn't seem to be applicable on Fedora and needs to be reworked. * /usr/bin/xbmc contains some magic to produce "verbose core dump logs". I am not sure, this logic is useful in general and on Fedora in particular (abrt already takes care about it), but I don't have a strong opinion on it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
