2010/2/23 David Timms <[email protected]> > On 24/02/10 07:27, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030 >> >> --- Comment #100 from Alex Lancaster<[email protected]> >> 2010-02-23 21:27:38 --- >> (In reply to comment #99) >> >>> Ok, I'm willing to review this, but so far the only packages I've >>> reviewed for >>> Fedora have been softballs and this looks like it will be pretty massive. >>> >> >> Excellent! I'm sure others will also step in to help out. Also there's >> been >> a fair amount of "reviewing" already especially by Ralf (see the previous >> almost 100 comments!) so the package has already been through the ringer >> already and some of the trickier issues have already been addressed. >> >> Is -12 current? >>> >> >> Yep: -12 is the most recent. >> > > Hi, I would like to suggest that this package review (which has really been > more of a packaging development bug) be closed, and a new one requested. > (close duplicate after create new bug) > > This would keep the normal review stuff together, and uncluttered by the > preliminary package development work. > > Anyone else agree/disagree ? > > Cheers, > David Timms. > I don't see any problem with keeping the same bug report for the review, That development side was fully part of the review process. I don't see any reason to split, specially as this review seems exemplary of what work need to be achieved if a package doesn't comply with our guidelines.
Once that said, I guess a sum-up of what remain to be worked on, would be welcome for a new comer. Nicolas (kwizart)
