http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #121 from Alex Lancaster <[email protected]> 2010-03-03 11:28:23 --- (In reply to comment #120) > (In reply to comment #119) > > OK, I have some feedback on cximage (as well as some other libraries), from > > upstream: > > > > "1) XBMC wraps cximage in a dll interface. > This is the actual cause behind much of xbmc's bloat: Instead of using a > system's dynamic loader, they implemented an application-specific dll-loader > ;) No doubt, but the question is, what should we do about it for the moment in terms of packaging? I can't see packaging it separately and getting xbmc to compile against it in the short-term. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
