http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1035
--- Comment #14 from NicolasChauvet <[email protected]> 2010-03-20 21:10:08 --- So the basic thing is that you cannot use the GPLv2 License tag either in the RPM spec file, that's what is confusing. Then, there is a need to check if this package which is provided as the "AMAP" license (not the "GPLv2 with AMAP disclaimers") will be compliant with openssl and pcre, which this seems to be. While we are at it, can you tweak theses two things and Fix the License: --------------------- in build.log ln: creating symbolic link `amap6': File exists make: [install] Error 1 (ignored) + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /home/builder/rpmbuild/BUILD/amap-5.2 extracting debug info from /home/builder/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/amap-5.2-2.fc12.x86_64/usr/bin/amap extracting debug info from /home/builder/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/amap-5.2-2.fc12.x86_64/usr/bin/amap6 *** WARNING: identical binaries are copied, not linked: /usr/bin/amap6 and /usr/bin/amap extracting debug info from /home/builder/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/amap-5.2-2.fc12.x86_64/usr/bin/amapcrap 232 blocks --------------------- in %description assistingnetwork -> assisting-network -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
