http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127
David Timms <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from David Timms <[email protected]> 2010-04-06 00:08:18 --- (In reply to comment #4) > * Remove repositories which provides non-open-source software only. > * Remove Livna repository. > * Remove ATrpms repository. Hi Homer, I'm pretty sure that messing with people's software repository configuration is not acceptable in a package. (I haven't taken a look at how this was achieved in this package). An example why this might be bad: eg user installs package A from (removed repo), that requires current versions of libraries. They then install this package, which disables the repo. Fedora offers security patches for the libs that package A requires (specific version). Now the user can never successfully update to the security fixed packages because yum sees that the installed package would break. ps. I haven't performed a normal review. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
