http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313
--- Comment #26 from Hicham HAOUARI <[email protected]> 2010-08-01 22:19:22 --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > (In reply to comment #23) > > > (In reply to comment #22) > > > > > > > This is irrelevant here, you use flashblock or whatever the equivalent > > > > is on > > > > other browsers. > > > > > > To give some context, I'm coming from a University setting with 1000+ > > > Fedora > > > workstations and over 3000 users. > > > > > > Gnash is out of the question for us (stability and support costs) but we > > > are > > > finding lightspark promising. Flashblock etc. isn't really an option for > > > us > > > either as it asks things of the users. > > > > > > Easy enough for us to patch out the gnash requirement and put it in a > > > local > > > repo though. > > > > > > Just giving a different perspective. > > > > > > > Gnash is necessary for complete youtube support since lightspark doesn't > > support avm1 swfs. > > > > We can remove gnash from the requirements, but then you will have to > > install it > > manually to have full youtube support. > > I agree it shouldn't depend on it. I removed gnash long ago as its a CPU hog. > If the person wants open flash support for older videos its likely they'll > already have it installed. > Ok, no problem, since rpm doesn't support recommends. Off Topic : gnash may end up in rpmfusion too to properly support hwaccel in 0.8.8 with the introduction of vaapi. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
