W dniu 30.09.2010 05:12, Chen Lei pisze: > 2010/9/30 Julian Sikorski <[email protected]>: >> Dear all, >> >> recently a request was filed to rename this packages to mame-data-foo >> [1], which has prompted me to ask myself the question: do these packages >> make any sense? >> In my opinion, they violate two of the packaging guidelines: code vs >> content and shipping multiple upstreams in one package. I think that >> sdlmame-data itself makes some sense since it enriches the experience >> with frontends, but others are pointless imo. Having said that, I just >> issued what I think will be a final update to sdlmame-data samples. >> Also, co-maintainers for the main sdlmame-data package are welcome. >> >> Julian >> >> [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1426 >> >> > Maybe you can also retire sdlmess-data* packages as well :) > > Chen Lei > This is a little different, since mess-data packages files which are actually shipped in the mess zip.
Julian
