http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=993
--- Comment #49 from Richard <[email protected]> 2010-10-21 14:57:26 --- (In reply to comment #48) > (In reply to comment #47) > > I was able to build the install rpm cleanly and install it but had a couple > > of > > questions. > > > > 1. Should the package be GPG signed by RPMFusion yet? I had to --nogpgcheck > > to > > get yum to install. > Packages only get signed by RPM Fusion after they have been accepted into and > built on the RPM Fusion builders. Hence --nogpgcheck is required while > developing the package. That makes sense, I just wanted to check. > > 2. I did a yum deplist on the resultant package and noticed it didn't list > > "mlt-melt" or "frei0r-plugins" as dependencies. > > Are you testing with Elliott's patches, updated spec and newer upstream > version? I downloaded both patches and the spec from this bug report. I didn't see a link for the 1.2.2 source RPM so I downloaded it from the openshot website. I looked through the .spec file and didn't see any reference to mtl-melt (the package) or frei0r-plugins. > While successful running is important, more important is that the packaging > guidelines are followed - that is the point of the review - I'm encouraging > you > to take a look at the spec, and run through the packaging guidelines, to > decide > whether the spec passes, fails or you can't tell for each point in the spec. I did review the links but there was a LOT of info on them I just haven't had time to go through line by line. It may be this weekend before I do. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
