http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1252
--- Comment #12 from Mohamed El Morabity <[email protected]> 2010-11-11 17:38:28 --- As promised, here is a new version: SPEC URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/swftools/swftools.spec SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/swftools/swftools-0.9.1-2.fc14.src.rpm Build logs: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/swftools/build.log I added fftw-devel and zziplib-devel as BR, as suggested by Orion in comment #8. I also re-enabled the build of Python modules. I mentionned too the other licenses as asked by Orcan in comment #2. About the prefix patch, it seems it was already suggested: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/swftools-common/2009-06/msg00079.html With no effects... About the license issue, I've just sent a message on the SWFTools mailing list: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/swftools-common/2010-11/msg00084.html (In reply to comment #2) > ? The package bundles a copy of xpdf which is available in Fedora. Is it > possible to patch it out? I see no way to link against xpdf, no API or such is provided in the Fedora package. The sources embed a copy of gocr too, with the same problem. (In reply to comment #9) > If you allow me a suggestion, I think it would be extremely useful to package > also swftools-unstable with the latest development snapshots. Some bugfixes or > new implementations are there until the new version is released. Unless I directly submit the devel version here, I don't think guidelines would allow such a "double" packaging of swftools. (In reply to comment #3) > Please, also open a new account at rpmfusion as outlined in > http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-643ba68e754c44d2db673ad9aea6a843ad0b7fb3 Done. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
