On Monday 05 of September 2011 16:11:56 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/05/2011 02:32 PM, Karel Volný wrote: > > On Monday 05 of September 2011 13:58:02 Thomas Moschny wrote: > >> 2011/9/5 David Timms<dti...@iinet.net.au>: > >>> They don't appear in yum --enablerepo=* list ffmpeg (I > >>> see: ffmpeg.x86_64 0.7.1-1.fc16 rpmfusion-free-rawhide > >>> ) Do we need to wait until it's pushed to rawhide, so > >>> that our build will pick up the updated ffmpeg ? > >> > >> ffmpeg 0.8.2-1.fc16 is in the > >> "rpmfusion-free-needsign-rawhide" repository available on > >> the builders, it seems. > >> (Can be seen in root.log from recent builds.) > > > > so ... if I take the qmmp-plugins-freeweorld spec in devel, > > increment the release and do make tag, make build, it will > > be rebuilt with the new ffmpeg already and that is all I > > need to do? > > Yes, although ideally, you would download the new ffmpeg + > x264 from here: > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-developmen > t-rpmfusion_free/ > > As well as anything which you've installed which uses them. > and upgrade to them (removing anything that needs them which > has not been rebuild yet, which is a pain).
we used to call it a royal PITA ... I wonder how had I managed not to break my system with all that --nodeps rpm magic :-) > Then do a local rebuild, test it, and then do the increment > the release and do make tag, make build thingy. If you want > to go for really perfect, you then download the build result > and replace your local built rpm with it, and test again. thanks, done http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/plague-results/fedora-development- rpmfusion_free/qmmp-plugins-freeworld/0.5.1-2.fc16/ - if someone wants to test too ... K. -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) xmpp ka...@jabber.cz :: "Never attribute to malice what can :: easily be explained by stupidity."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.