https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1958
--- Comment #10 from Brendan Jones <brendan.jones...@gmail.com> 2011-11-19 14:55:07 CET --- Hi Julian, All good except rpmlint gives a warning about INSTALL files in %doc Required ======== [-] Not applicable [+] OK [!] Attention [ ] Not done [+] named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+] Meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] Approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines [+] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license [+] License file must be included in %doc [+] The spec file must be written in American English [+] The spec file for the package MUST be legible [+] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source sha1sum:f3968d678724a0e0c0af811aec971d83839fe3b4 [+] Successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one arch [+] Proper use of ExcludeArch [+] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] The spec file MUST handle locales properly [+] Shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun [+] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries [+] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package [+] A package must own all directories that it creates [+] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once [+] Permissions on files must be set properly [+] Each package must consistently use macros [+] The package must contain code, or permissable content [-] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage [+] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application [-] Header files must be in a -devel package [-] Static libraries must be in a -static package [+] library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package [+] devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [-] GUI apps must include a %{name}.desktop file, properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages [+] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Should Items ============ [+] the packager SHOULD query upstream for any missing license text files to include it [-] Non-English language support for description and summary sections in the package spec if available [+] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock [ ] The reviewer should test that the package functions as described [+] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane [+] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) should usually be placed in a -devel pkg [-] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself [+] Should contain man pages for binaries/scripts None available gmtk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mplayer -> player, m player, mp layer gmtk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mediaplayer -> media player, media-player, hypermedia gmtk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mplayer -> player, m player, mp layer gmtk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mediaplayer -> media player, media-player, hypermedia gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mplayer -> player, m player, mp layer gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mediaplayer -> media player, media-player, hypermedia gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mplayer -> player, m player, mp layer gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mediaplayer -> media player, media-player, hypermedia gmtk.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs /usr/share/doc/gmtk-1.0.5b1/INSTALL gmtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.