https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> 2011-12-10 05:36:20 CET --- > hmm... I hate to say it, but if this is using the same source as the package > in > Fedora then it should probably be treated like other projects like this. > You'll > need to package it just like Fedora but use rpmdiff to generate a rpm diff > file > that people can install. I've never done it before so I'm a little short on > details. Huh? No package in RPM Fusion is packaged as delta/patch RPMs, our toolset doesn't even support them. What we do is that we package a -freeworld RPM in RPM Fusion which contains only the files not in the Fedora RPM (by not building them if possible, or deleting them in %install otherwise), or if that's not possible, which overrides the files from the Fedora RPM without conflicting with it. This chromaprint-tools package is already following the recommended approach. > It's possible that's overkill since you're just adding a binary, but at a > minimum you'll need to keep to the same version as the Fedora release: > > Requires: chromaprint == %{version} > > or something like that. Uhm, no, please only add '='-versioned dependencies on Fedora packages if absolutely necessary (i.e. if the tools version x are not expected to work with the library version y≠x)! '='-versioned dependencies mean the packages in Fedora and RPM Fusion need to be pushed at exactly the same time, which in practice can only be approximated, so there's always a window where the user will not be able to update. Thus, please do not gratuitously add them when not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.