On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 19:20 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2012/1/1 Sérgio Basto <[email protected]>: > ... > >> install -m 0755 -D %{SOURCE10} \ > >> - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/ > >> + $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/vboxweb-service > > > > install -m 0755 -D %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/%{SOURCE10} > > is more logic for me. > This ends to have /etc/init.d/builddir/build/SOURCES/vboxweb-service > which will not work. > It could use $(basename ${SOURCE10}) but then there is no interest in > using install -D at first step.
ouch, my fault sorry. > ... > > About rename to VirtualBox > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1826 > > > > may I just change .spec > > Name: VirtualBox-OSE > > to > > Name: VirtualBox > > and keep same cvs locations ? > Nope - You will need to create another review and obsolete the previous > package. > Anyway what the interest of that ? I don't see any. > You can still use a virtual provide for VirtualBox or virtualbox. Is just about naming of package, "adopted the new naming convention" Now, rpm -q VirtualBox package VirtualBox is not installed and rpm -q VirtualBox-OSE VirtualBox-OSE-4.1.8-1.fc16.x86_64 when we want the opposite We just have to change the name of the package, it already installed in /usr/lib64/virtualbox -- Sérgio M. B.
