2012/2/1 Kevin Kofler <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > before I start submitting review requests, I'll ask: What's the procedure > for moving packages from Fedora to RPM Fusion? Do we require a rereview? > > I'm asking because of: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/160856.html > > There are actually 2 cases, which may or may not need to be distinguished: > * xine-lib itself, which will have xine-lib and xine-lib-extras-freeworld > merged together and thus see significant packaging changes, and > * the applications using xine-lib, which will basically be transferred 1:1 > (unless fixes are needed to build with xine-lib 1.2).
Hi Kevin, I haven't answered to your previous topic, But I was wondering that: I've seen that several fedora packages was bundling some part of the offending library in their source tarball already. That's the case for a default sound server in fedora. Maybe it can be done the same for xine-lib ? Once that said, as a package coordinator. I feel like it will be easier to me to only have xine-lib within RPM Fusion than to get in sync with fedora updates. I think it would be fine to have a formal package review request in RPM Fusion so anyone have a chance to comment on what will be introduced as a replacement. Thx for your work on the topic. Nicolas (kwizart)
