https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1065
Jeremy Newton <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Newton <[email protected]> 2012-02-21 19:32:20 CET --- (In reply to comment #3) > Mac's license issue is tough for me. > So I simply disabled mac support > (Aqualung has the capability to play .ape using ffmpeg instead of mac). > And this package came to "free". > --- > Spec URL: http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.jp/rpms/45780/aqualung.spec > SRPM URL: > http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.jp/rpms/45782/aqualung-0.9-0.5.svn1115.fc12.src.rpm > --- Are you still interested in maintaining this? As I have some time to do reviews. (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > While the patent-encumbered stuff is fine in RPM Fusion, linking this GPLv2+ > > program against the non-Free and thus GPL-incompatible mac looks very much > > like a no-go to me. > > this comes from upstream - maybe someone should tell them they are breaking > their own licensing :-) > > anyways, I thought this is exactly what the non-free section of RPMFusion is > for ... if we have mac, why not to have anything that links to it? - the > Aqualung authors' intention surely wasn't to prevent distribution and usage of > their software Though this comment was made 2 years ago, for clarification reasons, believe the issue is the violation of the GPL, not so much a RPMFusion specific issue. This needs to have the libraries that link to mac (or other non-free) to be LPGL or another compatible license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
