https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2213
--- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede <[email protected]> 2012-03-09 16:17:16 CET --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > On the other hand, what you say seems a good idea. That's OpenSUSE's > > approach, > > I think: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=love.spec&package=love&project=home%3ARedDwarf&rev=5e7328cbba45a16aa8d0cc5dbffc587c > > > > Anyway, I think that having also a mpg123 version into RPMFusion would be > > useful for some cases. > > Good point, I can rename this to love-freeworld and submit the modified > version > to fedora. Yes and no, the problem is that both versions then will either conflict, or we will need to rename various files inside the packages. IE rename the -freeworld binary to /usr/bin/love-freeworld and I guess have the rest of the files in a love-common package which then would be provided by the Fedora package. I guess the big question is are there a few good Free games using love which can go to Fedora, because if there aren't any I wonder if it is worth the trouble. I also must say that love is a very generic package and binary name is which is just asking for conflicts. I notice that the website is love2d.org. Maybe we should use love2d as package name too? Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
