https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483
--- Comment #16 from Rob Janes <janes....@gmail.com> 2012-10-07 21:46:31 CEST --- also, renamed the package to msttcore-fonts-installer. Kevin - I was describing the debian package for the msttcore fonts. I'm sorry if you understood that to be a proposal for a this rpm package. It was not. It was intended to be a compare and contrast. As a pro and con comparison, certainly the eula prompt is a con. On the pro side, is the automated download and installation of these fonts. Another on the pro side, is the background download and installation of the fonts. I don't quite see how to do that in fedora. Thorsten, Kevin - while I disagree with the idea that spec file scripts should be short, I don't think it's productive to argue about it. The debian package builder choose to split out the script, and I agree it helps debugging and has legitimate independent functionality. So I've split it out. Nicholas - I suppose that's possible, but it involves a lot of user interaction I want to avoid. It sounds like a proposal that someone at microsoft might want to work on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.