2012/10/22 Richard Shaw <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2012/10/15 Richard Shaw <[email protected]>: >>> What's the chance of getting x264 updated in F16? The current version >>> (116) is too old for MythTV 0.26 and I'd like to keep the same version >>> across all releases. I only need >=118 but the same version as is >>> available in EL-6 would be great. >> >> What is the need of newer ABI ? is it because of ffmpeg built within >> mythtv ? or mythtv code that dropped older x264 API ? > > Because MythTV 0.26 requires x264 >=118 and F16 is still on 116. EL6 > is not a problem because it's already on version 120. > >> I understand that mythtv has a Network protocol that would requires >> several component to be at the same version. But why users are just >> upgrading to the new mythtv in F-17 instead ? This will also lead to a >> problem when EL-6 mythtv built will miss one or another dependency ? >> When to stop the updates there ? > > People often don't upgrade their MythTV boxes once they're setup. For > instance, I'm still running F14 on mine, although I plan on changing > to CentOS 6 when I have time. OK, then there is no point to update mythtv in F-16 either then.
Nicolas (kwizart)
