https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2565
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Dieter <[email protected]> 2012-11-08 19:07:14 CET --- (In reply to comment #3) > At a second thought, I think "my" way is correct for two reasons: > > - Practically, at last release upstream apologized for still using 0.9.8 i. > e., > they will shift to 1.0.0 quite soon. > > - The links used all points to an object with the same soname as the original. > However, the libssl 0.9.8 has not the same soname as 1.0.0, same applies to > libssl. > > Together with the stability problems (above) I think this boils down to > keeping the bundled libssl/libcrypto until upstream upgrades to 1.0.0 - which > probably isn't that long. Agreed. There are generally good reasons for soname changes, so, while a symlink might work for a while, there's no guarantee that the application won't call some function that has changed and segfault. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
