https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483
--- Comment #28 from Karel Volný <kvo...@redhat.com> 2013-05-27 11:11:58 CEST --- (In reply to comment #27) > I've reviewed the rpmfusion guidelines and haven't seen where I've violated > the guidelines. probably, this is the rule in question: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packages_which_are_not_useful_without_external_bits and as RPMFusion inherits Fedora rules, you'd need an exception from this, rather than saying that it's not in RPMFusion rules so it is okay personally, I wouldn't have any objection against such an exception, but I've heard rumours that there are machines not connected to Internet where people want to install Fedora too > Of course, there is Kevin Kofler's claim that the violation was > self evident and obvious, and therefore did not need to be stated. > So, perhaps I've missed the thing that was so obvious (at least to Kevin > Kofler) that it wasn't written in to the guidelines. ahem, I believe the "selfobvious" argument was directed only to the interactivity, not to downloads ... needing interaction would mean breaking kickstarts, automatic updates and the sole "yum -y", that's really obvious we can't do it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.