https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3102
Alec Leamas <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|2 |3 --- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas <[email protected]> 2014-01-10 17:06:05 CET --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #10) > > > The fedora config file is fine just the user finds it. But generally > > speaking, she will not do this since she will look in the docs for it. > > Hence a specific README.fedora is probably needed which just says that > > the configuration file is added. No blocker. > > "works" as-is. Obviously, we disagree here. Fine with me. > > The configuration seems somewhat messy. The Makefile looks for a pkgconfig > > file, but vdr-devel does not provide this. OTOH vdr-devel does provide > > a vdr-config binary, but this is not used in the Makefile. Probably worth > > reporting upstream. If you maintain vdr-devel (?), you could just add a > > pkgconfig .pc file to it so things are more consistent. Or patch Makefile to > > use vdr-config. No blocker, it sort of "works" as-is. > > Makefile checks this with /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/vdr.pc (vdr-devel package) Yes, sorry, my bad. I missed that vdr-devel actually provided the .pc file Now, this looks much better. Actually, it looks good. Time to make a review. Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
