https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
--- Comment #2 from Alec Leamas <[email protected]> 2014-01-25 17:23:20 CET --- (In reply to comment #1) Hi! Thanks for feedback! > You cannot add requires fedora-release but generic-release as we do in > rpmfusion-release OK, thanks. Will fix > What repo-gui = 1.0 is for ? This is basically a way for system-config-repo to identify a package providing meta information on the repo. > Why Requires: hicolor-icon-theme and system-config-repo are mandatory needed ? Because one point is to turn the repo into searchable "application" in the gnome-software sense, requiring icons, .desktop file and a reasonable GUI action > > /etc and /usr can uses rpm macros. Yes, but new GL allows plain /etc and /usr. I fiond it clearar, but no big deal. > > Group: if ever needed , need to be accurate. Thanks, will fix (probably drop). > Is there an official packaged repo rpm from dropbox or only yum .repo file ? Neither, more of howto. However, I have pending packages for both situations. Updated links later this weekend. The important thing in this (for me) is that you don't seem to have any objections on the very idea to package this repo (?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
