Hi!, On Sex, 2014-09-26 at 07:24 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Hi, > > it seems like we had a bit of misunderstanding. I was under the > impression we are good to go with 2.4 in rawhide, and 2.2/2.3 for F20 > is > what we were discussing.
yes , as we have cvs, to avoid confusions etc, we like first copy devel to branch and after update devel, so devel keeps all story ... > I don't think it makes sense to roll back now, let's just rebuild the > dependencies to minimise breakage time. yes , I mean virtually roll back last commit and copy that to branch F20 . Until packages are signed and publish , no breakage happens , if you disable repo needsign. > I think I should apply for the ffmpeg deps commit access moving > forward, > so that there are more people who can do the rebuild. sorry don't understand what you mean here , but no worries we do the best we can . Meanwhile I'm very busy today, at least. Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.