https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551
--- Comment #7 from MartinKG <[email protected]> 2015-02-24 18:48:44 CET --- (In reply to comment #6) > Ok, it looks like you're removing two of the bundled libraries but two still > remain. > > In the case of natupnp.h it looks like it's only used on win32 so no problems > there, I would rm -rf thirdparty/natupnp to make sure. done > > In the case of sort.h we don't seem to be as lucky. Header only libraries are > treated as static libraries for packaging purposes. > > It may be easy enough to request a bundling exception to the RPM Fusion devel > list as we don't have a formal process like Fedora proper. I don't see this as > being a big risk. > > If granted, then we would need to add a virtual provides for tracking > purposes: > Provides: bundled(timsort) new rpm files: Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/openclonk.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/openclonk-5.5.1-6.fc21.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Feb 24 2015 Martin Gansser <[email protected]> - 5.5.1-6 - dropped CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS flags because already sets by %%cmake macro - dropped CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX because already sets by %%cmake macro - removed bundled natupnp - added virtual provides for tracking purposes what is the next step ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
