On Sáb, 2015-05-23 at 13:01 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2015-05-22 16:29 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com>: > Hi, Kelvin, > > On Ter, 2015-05-19 at 01:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > I've headed a mass rebuid on my own koji instance for > f22-free and it's > > > nearing completion. > > > > Unfortunately, a mass rebuild of the current CVS contents > without separate > > branches for F21 and F22 does not help me at all for > freetype-freeworld. I > > absolutely NEED a separate F21 branch to be able to do any > work on the F22 > > version. The package ought to track the version of Freetype > in Fedora. I > > cannot do this with one devel branch for 3 (!) different > releases (F21, F22, > > Rawhide/F23). > > > > Why can we not have CVS branches for F21 and F22? > > > Your question was already answered. "This is not a high > priority, you > > Can you please avoid doing such assumption! Kevin has received an > access to a preview git repository. freetype-freeworld needs to match > the fedora counterpart. Others packagers in the same situation can > request such override. So this is very different than VirtualBox 5.0 > which will have to wait. > > > I really do not appreciate your attempt to hijack the migration > process, please delete this github repository. > > If you help with the infra, please at least take one action and stop > re-doing something that was done properly by me already. > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3023 > > > thx for you understanding.
ok, ok, all repositories deleted, I wrote that is just one idea and is temporary, I'm not trying hijack nothing, just want have a temporary solution where I can develop my packages, my organization is a mess right now . Anyway is good to hear that migration is moving and thanks for writing to us and have some news . Thanks for your hard work and best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.