https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Comment #6 from Momcilo Medic <[email protected]> 2015-05-27 13:40:14 CEST --- Further diving into packaging indicates that all alpha software should have 0.* release tag. Rebuilt packages to honour this. Updated .src.rpm and .spec files: https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.1-0.1/obs-studio-0.10.1-0.1.fc21.src.rpm https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/0.10.1-0.1/obs-studio.spec rpmlint outputs: $ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.10.1-0.1.fc21.src.rpm obs-studio.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so* obs-studio.src:78: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs obs-studio.src:83: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.10.1-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.10.1-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.10.1-0.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
