https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3430
Hans de Goede <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|2 |4 --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede <[email protected]> 2015-12-28 16:33:38 CET --- Full review done: Good: ===== - rpmlint checks return: qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++) qtads.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman) qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. These can all be ignored - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (non-commercial) OK, text in %license, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file provided and properly installed Everything in order: Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
