https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4112
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande <[email protected]> 2016-07-09 20:05:27 CEST --- (In reply to comment #3) > > - rfpkg-minimal-0.1.0/bin/rfpkg is licensed under GPLv3+ > > LICENSE file is GPLv2 ?? > > That's exciting. This is an issue inherited from fedpkg-minimal that I didn't > notice... take a look at: > > * https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedpkg-minimal.git/tree/LICENSE > * https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedpkg-minimal.git/tree/bin/fedpkg > > The fedpkg-minimal spec claims the version is "GPLv2+". > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedpkg-minimal/sources/ > > I have filed https://fedorahosted.org/fedpkg-minimal/ticket/2 asking for > clarification. In the mean time, should we block on a response to that ticket > or assume GPLv2+ for now? > It looks to me like a venial error and those licenses are not even compatible. I guess you should indicate the stricter license (GPLv2), waiting for a reply from original author. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
