On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 21:29 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2018-09-11 16:19 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com>:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > So F29 and rawhide won't have ppc64 anymore ? , should I fix
> > https://rpmfusion.org/Architectures and replace ppc64 columns with
> > N/A.
> 
> Yes

OK

> Same as in fedora
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DiscontinuePPC64
> 
> Btw, please remind that repoview support in RPM Fusion repos will be
> removed at some random point in time.
> The reason is that we will move to koji "dist-repo" when the feature
> will be available (and functional). But this will not include support
> for repoview (same as in fedora).

I understand perfectly, support and will try to help on movement to
"koji "dist-repo" " .

> The alternative will be to support the "packages"  (1) application
> instead of spreading small files into mirrors.
> It would be better to have packages setup {before} having the
> repoview
> support dropped.

IMHO packages is not an alternative to repoview , repoview in a program
that runs over repo, analyze it and compute the list of new packages,
which for me is the best and fast way to see what was published, but
things are moving on and we will find an alternative , don't worry :) 

Thanks,

> Thx
> 
> (1) https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages
> 
> -- 
> -
> 
> Nicolas (kwizart)
> _______________________________________________
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfu
> sion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmf
> usion.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Reply via email to