Le ven. 23 nov. 2018 à 20:57, sergio <ser...@serjux.com> a écrit : > > You said that you could update it , aside I miss read that you also recommend > it , seems to me better have it updated for ffmepg 3.4 , why not update it ?
One interesting point is that ffmpeg-3.4 is the latest branch from the ffmpeg-3.x ABI, so it will have more feature than 3.3x while having the same binary compatibilities. As such, I'm fine to have ffmpeg-3.4x if possible. Now what would be reasons that could prevent ffmpeg-3.4x updates for EL7 ? - Too much missing deps from RHEL upstream ? For that a scratch build in koji should be enought to test. - Some internal changes in ffmpeg that would make it difficult at runtime. There it's more difficult to test because there is a need to rebuild the ffmpeg dependencies or at least to do basic runtime tests with dependencies rebuilt with ffmpeg-3.3 and ffmpeg updated to 3.4. What makes this choice difficult is that we don't have a fedora branch to pick as a base where we know that a particular package works as appropriate with ffmpeg-3.4x (given f27 was with ffmpeg 3.4 and fc28 4.0). So that's the main reason I consider keeping ffmpeg-3.3 as a relevant choice, based on our maintainance history. It may be possible to have the ffmpeg "last branch of the previous ABI" updated in EL as a general rule, so we don't have an arbitrary choice for the next time. For thoses that would want the latest ffmpeg there, we should probably go with epel-next, software collection or modules, docker (or even ffmpeg-latest) etc... But that's another topic. Nicolas (kwizart) _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
