Le lun. 27 avr. 2020 à 13:02, Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl> a écrit : > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:27:05PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > Thanks for the heads up! It's important to know about such caveats. > > > People depending on Kodi with unported plugins should postpone > > > upgrading to F32. Fedora 31 is going to be supported until around > > > November/December this year. Let's hope it's enough time to get plugins > > > ported from dead python version to py3. > > > > How would you advertise such caveat to end-users ? > > I found original post as good source, but now I see we are on > developers list. Similar posting to rpmfusion-users would do. > > For Fedora releases, there is a common bugs page > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs/Common), which is linked in release > announcment. Users read this page before upgrading to decide if there is > something impacting them. We don't have equivalent for RPMFusion.
We could introduce a CommonBugs page in our wiki, but I'm not sure who will read this? I usually don't read it before to upgrade my main workstation to f32 few after the beta. But it will be my fault if I would miss some commonBugs. Side note, I'm concerned that one commonBugs entry in Fedora mentions RPM Fusion, I'm trying to escalate that because the wording is in our defavour for a broken design that is obviously due to Fedora system-upgrade... About the advertising issue, the user mailing list is about few hundred subscribers which is far more than the twitter account. I'm pretty sure that once rpmfusion is installed on a system, there is not so much needs to go back to the website or else... (that's why a tool like fedy would help to better advertise rpmfusion solutions/informations on end-users desktop). -- - Nicolas (kwizart) _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
