Le mer. 30 sept. 2020 à 16:21, Tobias Girstmair <t-rpmfus...@girst.at> a écrit : > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:56:50AM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > It was my interpretation that the request > > (from rpmfusion-nonfree to rpmfusion-free) > > had to do with the source license (and > > did not address the entire IP minefield > > regarding usage that many codecs live > > As fair as I can see, we package other patent-encumbered software in > rpmfusion-free (e.g. the *-freeworld stuff). > > > in). So the library with full capabilities > > would presumably have to stay in > > rpmfusion (at least until the remaining > > patents expire, which I last saw estimated > > to be around 2025/6), and the question > > on the table is the group (nonfree vs free). > > Yes. Moving to fedora is out of the question for now. My request is > only about where in rpmfusion this package should be. > > -- tobias
@Tobi Can you remind why this is important question ? And why you are asking this question now ? (what is the use case behind). You haven't answered to my earlier request. Thanks _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
