https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
--- Comment #22 from Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Maxwell G from comment #21)
> If suggesting "dnf install --allowerasing mesa-va-drivers-freeworld" isn't
> workable, I can think of a couple other solutions. I don't think any of
> these are ideal, but there's not much else we can do.
>
> One solution is to name the va-drivers subpackage mesa-va-drivers and have
> "Epoch: 1". I think that's against RPMFusion's policies, though.
>
We don't need an Epoch on this side...
> The mesa-va-drivers-freeworld subpackage could Obsolete the Fedora package
> and have "Provides: mesa-va-drivers = 1:%{version}-%{release}", but I think
> that's worse.
>
This would ensure ours would be considered an upgrade...
> We could ask the mesa maintainers to add
>
> ```
> Recommends: (mesa-va-drivers or mesa-va-drivers-freeworld)
> Suggests: mesa-va-drivers-freeworld
> ```
>
> but that's against Fedora's policies and wouldn't work if mesa-va-drivers is
> installed before RpmFusion is enabled.
This is not permitted, since we can't reference packages that don't exist in
Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
