https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6505
Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #17 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #15)
...
> I disagree. I think informing about what the package does at least briefly
@Petr Thank for rising your concern, theses are valuable comments.
I'm all in favour to advertise correctly what the software does, specially as
it relies on dropbox downloaded binary, which end-users might not expect.
@Julian
Would you mind to advertise correctly that in package description at least ?
Also few nitpicks:
- Since i686 isn't used nowadays It would be better to simplify with x86_64
only (and switch the noarch sub-package into arched one).
- We tend to use Source0 over un-versioned Source directive.
Also if you can work on having appdata support, it will helps to advertise
correctly to graphical download apps.
Thanks all
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
