Le mer. 11 sept. 2024 à 16:04, Gary Buhrmaster via rpmfusion-developers <[email protected]> a écrit : > > What is the current thinking on a schedule for > RPMFusion to create the initial infrastructure > for the EL 10 distribution? Fedora has opened > EPEL10 koji targets, and there has been some > activity getting packages built in EPEL10. > From my observation here are still a lot of > packages that need to be built for EPEL10 to > make it a viable base for some packages in > RPMFusion (I have opened Bugzillas for > some packages I will be needing) but it > might be nice for the RPMFusion packagers > to be able to test, request additional EPEL10 > branches and builds, and build their > RPMFusion packages before C10S is > expected to be available (2024Q4?). > > Thanks for any insight you can offer.
Good question ! We should be able to create a collection (in pkgdb) and have an initial koji build target soon. From the infra side, do we start building for Centos Stream 10 (as el10s koji build target or alike). and later switch build for RHEL (or clones) as el10. or do we maintain both branches. We may adapt rfpkg and koji tags a little for this support. Then there is a need to wire others part of the infra, but it can be at a later step (gpg key, mash, scripts, etc) Also I don't get why epel went with el10.0 dist. There will be strictly no matching with the RHEL package set. CentOS Stream has its own pace to update packages. So to me it's a wrong assumption that any epel tag for centos 10 stream would induce any compatibility with related RHEL versions. At least there is only currently one epel10 branch there. _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
