Once upon a time, Simone Caronni <[email protected]> said:
> I think it makes more sense to have it `noarch` for the coming `aarch64`
> variant or the `steamrt3c` runtime becoming the default.

That doesn't seem like a good reason to make it "noarch" - are you going
to package multiple architectures in a single binary RPM?  It still
needs to be archful, even if that arch changes from i686 to x86_64,
because aarch64 should be a completely separate binary RPM.
-- 
Chris Adams <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
  • Fwd: Steam package... Simone Caronni via rpmfusion-developers
    • Re: Fwd: Stea... Chris Adams via rpmfusion-developers
      • Re: Fwd: ... Simone Caronni via rpmfusion-developers
        • Re: F... Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
        • Re: F... Chris Adams via rpmfusion-developers
          • R... Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers
            • ... Simone Caronni via rpmfusion-developers
              • ... Gary Buhrmaster via rpmfusion-developers
                • ... Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via rpmfusion-developers
                • ... Simone Caronni via rpmfusion-developers
                • ... Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
                • ... Simone Caronni via rpmfusion-developers

Reply via email to