Patrick: I believe if you use Autoreq you have to manually specify the requirements, but I'm not entirely sure.
George On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Patrick <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:39:16AM -0500, George Galt wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Patrick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Did you have any problems with libnvcuvid.so? > > > > > > ATrpms had this same issue last month. The issue is that rpm inspects > the > > binaries and builds a list of things required and things that the package > > provides. For some reason, it generates a dependency of > > libnvcuvid.so()(64-bit) but builds a list of the things provided of > > libnvcuvid.so.1(64-bit) (IIRC). > > > > Look at the ATrpms dev list for how to fix this in the .spec file: > > http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/2012-December/thread.html > > > > In particular, I believe the suggestion here: > > > http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/2012-December/002931.htmlwas > > the ultimate fix. You could also look at the spec file in ATrpms for > > ideas: > > > http://dl.atrpms.net/src/f17-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics310.19-310.19-154.src.rpm\ > > > > FYI, I had no problem building this for F18 without applying the above > fix, > > so I'm not sure if there is something that is different with Fedora <= 17 > > that is causing this problem. > > I tried adding "Autoreq: 0" to the spec file, and it made no difference. > > I also tried adding another filter (though the existing one looks like it > should work correctly too) to the spec file, like this: > > %filter_from_requires /^libnvcuvid\.so/d; > > That also made no difference. > > I finally just installed using rpm with --nodeps, and it's booted and > working fine so far. > > Hopefully my xorg execessive cpu usage problem will be solved, I won't > know until the system has been up for a while. > > -- Patrick >
