On Qua, 2013-04-24 at 10:47 +0100, John Pilkington wrote: > On 24/04/13 10:30, John Pilkington wrote: > > > >>>> nvidia-xconfig showing as updated to 304.60 but ok. I don't think I > >>>> have > >>>> any relevant ATrpms packages installed now, and the URL shows that > >>>> 304.64 has given other people trouble. > >>> > >>> repoquery --envra --releasever=17 \*nvidia\* > >>> --disablerepo=free-fedora-update-testing > >>> > >>> you have > >>> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-304.88-1.fc17.x86_64 > >>> and > >>> nvidia-xconfig-1.0-20.fc17.x86_64 > > > > Yes, but 304.88 is in nonfree-update-testing, so your test still sees it. > > > > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/testing/17/x86_64/kmod-nvidia-304.88-1.fc17.3.x86_64.rpm > > > > 19-Apr-2013 11:04 38K > > > > Anyway, I have installed it and all seems ok. xorg.conf remains as it > > was after my edit, so the nvidia modules are being loaded and it works, > > at least for me. > > > > It's probably not worth making changes to the 304.64 packages now, since > > they will presumably soon disappear and this thread is in the archive. I > > was just trying to make several simultaneous major changes to my system > > and a broken graphics driver didn't help. > > > > Cheers > > > > John P > > > And I see that /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/00-nvidia.conf, provided by > xorg-x11-drv-nvidia, > has the same intended effect as my edit to xorg.conf; it just looks as > if xorg.conf had precedence.
yes now xorg could be configured in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ so with 00-nvidia.conf xorg.conf should only have drive nvidia section. -- Sérgio M. B.
