On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Richard, > > On Tuesday, 06 August 2013 at 03:41, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I don't think there's any reason mediainfo[1] can't go in Fedora, but I > > figured the most likely user base would be here in RPM Fusion. > > > > This has been a useful utility for me giving very detailed media > > information and I'm considering submitting it for review anyway, but it > > requires two other libraries that are not yet in Fedora and I've got > enough > > packages to take care of as it is. > > > > That being said, if someone will help with the reviews and offer to > > co-maintain, I'd consider submitting them for review. > > I can review, but not co-maintain. (Un)fortunately, upstream provides > their own RPMs, which are... odd. You'll need to come up with a set of > Provides: and Obsoletes: and try to convince upstream to stop doing > their own and point to official Fedora repositories instead once it > passes review. I was trying to decide if I would bother trying make the official packages conflict with theirs, I think it may be more of a case of caveat emptor. In the case of the libraries though, he appends a 0 to the package name. I'm not sure what problems that would create. Richard
