Hi Niels, you are right ... line 742 is not necessary ... since in r291 there was also this line added
@@ -2584,7 +2580,7 @@ } - im->gdes[im->gdes_c-1].step=def_step; + im->gdes[im->gdes_c-1].step=im->step; im->gdes[im->gdes_c-1].stack=0; im->gdes[im->gdes_c-1].debug=0; im->gdes[im->gdes_c-1].start=im->start; this suffices ... thanks tobi Tuesday Niels Endres wrote: > Hi, > > When I try the following using rrdtool 1.2.13: > > rrdtool graph test.png > DEF:val=test.rrd:data:AVERAGE > DEF:avg=test.rrd:data:AVERAGE:step=3600 > LINE:val#ff0000 > LINE:avg#00ff00 > > the avg line is the same as the val line (instead of being a lower > resolution average, as the default step is 600). > > I've traced this back to the "im->gdes[i].step = im->step;" operation > on line 742 of rrd_graph.c. Removing this line fixes this problem. I > can't work out why it's there in the first place, so don't know if this > would break something else. > > Cheers, > Niels > > -- ETH Zurich Tobias Oetiker, IT Support Group D-ITET (ISG.EE) ETL F24.2, Physikstrasse 3, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland Phone +41 44 63 25286, http://people.ee.ethz.ch/oetiker/ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi